home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac of the 20th Century
/
TIME, Almanac of the 20th Century.ISO
/
1990
/
93
/
apr_jun
/
05319918.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-02-27
|
4KB
|
91 lines
<text>
<title>
(May 31, 1993) Kevorkian Speaks His Mind
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
May 31, 1993 Dr. Death: Dr. Jack Kevorkian
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
COVER
SOCIETY, Page 39
Kevorkian Speaks His Mind
</hdr>
<body>
<p>Jack Kevorkian and Jon Hull
</p>
<p> The doctor was firm and combative. "There's no rational argument
against this," said Dr. Kevorkian as he sat down with TIME's
Midwest bureau chief Jon Hull. At the time, the Michigan legislature
was rushing to make assisted suicide a crime punishable by four
years in jail. But Kevorkian seemed unperturbed. Asked if he
would defy the law, Kevorkian simply said, "I never speculate
about the future. All I do is what's right for the patient."
Ever since the passage of the law--and even with last week's
court overturn of the ban--the self-styled obitiatrist has,
for the most part, kept his silence. Following are excerpts
from Kevorkian's conversation with Hull:
</p>
<p> Q. What qualifies you to judge who should and should not get
help killing themselves?
</p>
<p> A. Being a medical doctor. People say, "Well you're just a pathologist."
My specialty is death. And if not a pathologist, who? Would
you have a pediatrician do it? Or let's get more absurd. What
if I was a urologist? Could I help only men end their lives?
</p>
<p> Q. At the very least, shouldn't you have a longstanding relationship
with the patient?
</p>
<p> A. Why is that important? All the patients I have helped had
longstanding relations with their physicians. And where were
the physicians? In my medical school days, I saw cases where
the surgeon didn't even see the patient until he was under anesthesia
on the operating table.
</p>
<p> Q. How do you decide whom to help? Does the patient have to
suffer from a life-threatening illness?
</p>
<p> A. No, of course not. And it doesn't have to be painful, as
with quadriple gia. But your life quality has to be nil.
</p>
<p> Q. And who decides that?
</p>
<p> A. That's up to physicians, and nobody can gainsay what doctors
say. It all boils down to the integrity of the doctors. This
is what people are afraid of. They don't really trust their
doctors, and I can see why. They have made a mess of their profession.
</p>
<p> Q. What about people who suffer emotionally and want to die?
</p>
<p> A. I get many such calls and requests. But critics would say
that the person is not mentally competent to make a rational
decision, which is not always true, you know. I'll give you
the reason we can't do it now. It hasn't been researched. Once
this gets going as a practice for physically debilitated people,
the psychiatrists are going to have a whopping job because it
is going to be up to them to decide how this fits into their
field.
</p>
<p> Q. Don't we risk making death too easy?
</p>
<p> A. There is only one way to combat that. Only certain specialists
should be allowed to do it, in conjunction with personal physicians
and any other consultants they bring in. If they misbehave,
they get the ax.
</p>
<p> Q. You've said you believe there is a conspiracy against you.
</p>
<p> A. Oh! At the risk of seeming paranoid: the A.M.A. is opposed
to this, and all the medical societies--but not the average
doctor. More than half like it, but they can't speak because
the A.M.A. will come down hard on them. You call this a democracy?
Ha! It's a cryptic totalitarian state.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>